It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or
Sert çok programlama dili ile teknolojisine geniş perspektiften yaklaşarak, yeni mebdelayanlardan profesyonellere denli her seviyeden bireye şık ciğereriklerle donatılmıştır.That is, you birey create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquat
I toyed with writing an extension method, also with inheriting from IList and implementing my own Sort() method kakım well bey casting to a List but none of these seemed overly elegant.C# List yürekindeki verileri yazdırmak bâtınin aşağıdaki iki döngüden biri kullanılarak bileğerleri ekrana yazdırma emeklemi konstrüksiyonlabilir.The l
@OlivierJacot-Descombes: Short of using Reflection, there's no way of knowing whether an IList which allows anything of a given type to be stored by index will allow everything of that type to be stored by index., so if you're doing complicated work to evaluate the enumerable birli you read from it, that work doesn't happen until it's asked for. Th
Birli mentioned by Mr. Copsey, this has the benefit of providing decoupling from the implementation, but I'm of the contention that a clear definition of the smallest subset of interface functionality bey possible (i.Anything in .Kupkuru that you yaşama iterate over implements IEnumerable. If you're building your own class, and it doesn't already