C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı Için Adım Haritaya göre Yeni Adım

C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı Için Adım Haritaya göre Yeni Adım

Blog Article

It's normally expected that if you implement IEquatable.Equals you will also override Object.Equals to be consistent. In this case how would you support both reference and structural equality?

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

The following example creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.

Default property. The second time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the StructuralComparisons.StructuralEqualityComparer property. The third time, it passes the custom NanComparer object. Bey the output from the example shows, the first three method calls return true, whereas the fourth call returns false.

Kakım an example, it might make sense for two different instances of an Employee class to be considered equal if they both represent the same entity in your system.

45IStructuralEquatable seObj = x bey IStructuralEquatable; 64IStructuralEquatable seObj = obj as IStructuralEquatable;

IStructuralEquatable is quite new and unknown, but I read somewhere that it kişi be used to compare the contents of collections and arrays. Am C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı I wrong, or is my .Safi wrong?

This is very disappointing behaviour from Microsoft; I'm now wondering if I should review the list of cases I've filed and see if other ones I've submitted have been removed...

Reading through the excellent blog post by Sergey on struct equality performance he mentions that the default implementations are pretty slow and using boxing for each member. Additionally, he mentions that a memory comparison may not give you the correct results in this super simple example:

If you read this entire post and are thinking wow that is a lot of code and steps to remember then do hamiş fear because Dustin told me and showed me that Visual Studio will generate all of this for you!!!!! Check this out:

Safi on a certain ortam, I'm compelled to issue the standard warning not to rely on the values of hashcodes or how they are computed, since it is not guaranteed to be the same across updates or platforms.

The example on MSDN gives part of the answer here; it seems to be useful for heterogeneous equality, rather than homogeneous equality - i.e. for testing whether two objects (/values) of potentially different types

Fantasy TV series with a male protagonist who uses a bow and arrows and saf a hawk/falcon/eagle type bird companion

Bu alanda veya değişik bir alanda, benim ve özge yardımcı insanoğluın paylaşımlarına lütfen acizliğiniz ve ezikliğinizle yaklaşmayınız. İzin istemek, benim hükmüm şeşna girmeniz fehvaına gelmemektedir.